|
|
Young People Write About War
Peace Studies Argument Essay 2
11/15/07
To whom it may concern,
I cannot and will not go to war, simple as that. There is no part of
me that is or will ever be comfortable with mass killing for any reason,
no matter how “noble.” And furthermore, there have been far too many
examples of peaceful resolution for me to be under the mindset that
war is necessary, under almost any circumstances. This being said I
understand the purpose of military action in self-defense. However,
if there was a positive change that allowed us to end war completely
(which there won't be unless we make some kind of movement towards peace),
then there would be absolutely no need for self-defense and hence no
need for war. I stand firm in this belief and, although my objecting
to the draft is a very small drop in the pool of peaceful action, it
is a something I must do to serve my country on a path towards peace.
It is the best way I can imagine to “be the change I wish to see” in
America.
A conscientious objector is, by definition, “one who objects to participation
in all forms of war, and whose belief is based on a religious, moral,
and ethical belief system” (www.objector.org). My objection to war,
although partially based upon my religious views, is actually mostly
dictated by one simple moral, do unto others as you would have them
do unto you. This is something that was engraved deeply into my belief
system growing up, and I continue to act on it to this day, particularly
in my refusal, above all, to kill any other being; I would not want
my life taken from me, so how can I take the life of another? Michael
Servetus eloquently connects my refusal to kill with idealogical war:
“to kill a man is not to defend a doctrine, but to kill a man.”
You may take this objection and turn it into cowardice. You would say
that it is not my censure of killing, but my own fear of death, that
leads to my want for CO status. I can understand this confusion (although
I recognize that that is all it is), and I will openly and freely admit
that the mystery of life after death terrifies me to no end. However,
the thing that horrifies me far more than dying in war is killing in
war. I can honestly say that, given the choice, I would gladly be shot
down right now than be forced to kill others and have to see their faces
every night in my dreams, and be constantly pitted against guilt and
self-hatred for the rest of my life. If this was what my existence looked
like, I'm sure I would end up taking my own life anyway because I would
be driven mad by shame and self-repulsion, both of which, in my opinion,
would be justified and deserved (this is not by any means to say that
all soldiers or veterans are deserving of this, it is just how I would
feel about myself). If it is cowardly to feel this way, to be scared
of having to live day in and day out in a cloud of agonizing remorse,
then so be it, I will proudly stand up embrace this title. Because being
a coward I can live with; being a monster I cannot.
Although I have no one prescribed set of personal religious beliefs
(meaning, I don't consider myself Christian, Muslim, Jewish, etc.),
I belong to a church that has a very specific set of morals, known as
our seven principles, and almost all of these principles can in some
way be used to object to war. They are as follows:
we affirm and promote:
the inherent worth and dignity of every person,
justice, equity, and compassion for all,
the free, responsible search for truth and meaning,
the right of conscience,
the goal of world community,
and respect for the interdependent web of all life.
It is obvious that these principles can not be upheld in warfare. How
can you recognize the worth and dignity of a person and treat them with
justice, equity, and compassion if you aren't even able to look at their
lives and their land with any sort of respect? And if someone's outside
environment is being ravished by invaders, it certainly takes a lot
of attention for them off of tending their spirituality, because they
are always preoccupied trying to stay alive. And there is no possible
way that war could ever occur with respect for other life or allow for
a world community; war dishonorably takes life and creates further hostility
and anger among nations. Therefore, I am choosing to exercise my right
of conscience, as I feel I must, in objecting to this war.
You may say that this argument is void, that because I do not hold one
personal doctrine or have a real “religious belief,” I am not eligible
for CO status. It is true that my spirituality doesn't coincide with
an organized religion, which is something that isn't required at my
church. However, this does not make me void of spirituality, in fact
I draw from each religion (including Buddhism, Feminist Spirituality,
Christianity, etc) the things that suit my moral beliefs best to create
my own spiritual fulfillment. For example, my refusal to kill is based
upon the teachings of Buddha, and my respect for the earth that is irreversibly
devastated in warfare comes from my regard for Gaia (earth goddess)
followers.
My objection is not only to war, but also to the corrupt and much too
powerful armed forces that we as Americans value so dearly. After watching
the documentary “Ground Truth,” I saw the many ways in which the soldiers
who had so dutifully volunteered their lives, upon returning home, were
denied the health care and services they needed, or were made to jump
through hoops to get it. The army simply does not give back to the soldiers
what they selflessly sacrificed; they use them as worthless pawns in
the game of war, and there is something gravely wrong with that. You
may say that, having never been in the army, I have no grounds to be
so adamantly against it, and I somewhat agree with this statement because
I feel that people shouldn't judge without first really getting to know
the thing they are judging. However, this was not the first documentary
on the subject that I have seen, and I feel that, after listening with
compassion and an open heart and mind to all the soldiers describing
their wartime experiences (even those who were for it), I feel I have
gained enough insight into the world of war to know that it is not something
I can not participate in. For example, I read an account written by
Brian Wilson, a veteran of the Vietnam War that goes as follows:
I looked at the face of a young mother on the ground whose eyes appeared
to be open as she held two children in one arm, another child in the
other. Upon closer examination I realized she and her children had been
killed by bomb fragments...I looked at the mother's face, what was left
of it and it flashed at that point in my mind that the whole idea of
the threat of communism was ridiculous.
Many soldiers are facing images like these daily due to Post-Traumatic
Stress, and feel the same confusion about the worthiness of the loss
of life, because, in reality, there is no connection between communism
and Vietnamese civilians, or terrorism and Iraqi civilians, for that
matter. To have this horrific experience and then not be properly treated
by the institution that caused it is wrong, I cannot participate in
any way with this institution.
War is not and never will be an effective way to settle disputes. It
cannot end conflict, it only delays further conflict that is bred in
bitterness and resentment. We cannot reach out to peacefully embrace
our fellow human beings in brotherhood if we refuse to put down our
weapons, and there can never be peace when there is war. Nevertheless,
you say, it is still my duty to serve my country, because I am benefiting
from everything it has given to me. Well if military service is the
only way to do this, then my country can take back all it's gifts, or
I will move somewhere where the cost of freedom is not senseless killing.
In fact I plan on serving my country as much as I can, but in ways that
are productive and peaceful instead of slaughterous. I even always thought
that I would join the Peace Corps or AmeriCorps after college, although
I'm not sure if I could do that because they are still branches of the
system of armed forces of which I am against. I'm not sure how yet,
but I would also like to try to help out the people of my own country
before focusing attention on bringing democracy and stability to other
nations.
In conclusion, to feel as though I have contributed in some way to making
the future of the earth more bright, I must saying a polite “no thank
you” to your invitation to join the armed forces. War, to me, creates
hypocrisy and confusion, causing us as Americans to be unable to identify
exactly what it is we really stand for (For example, how can we in any
way be appalled by the attacks of September 11th without giving a second
thought to the ruthless murder and displacement of millions of innocent
Iraqis, fellow human beings?). We must think of the future; do we want
our children to pompously grow up thinking they can bully their way,
regardless of injustice or double standards, into getting whatever they
want? I know personally I envision a world where people can sit down
civilly and negotiate through their problems, but this world is just
a dream without a commitment to peace.
Yours Peacefully,
Elise Giasson
|
Address:
Veterans For Peace
William Ladd Chapter
PO Box 274
Freeport, ME 04032-0274
e-mail:
boblezervfp@suscom-maine.net
site problems?
webmaster
|