Veterans for Peace
William Ladd Chapter 001
Minutes and Observations from Retreat
January 24, 2009
Chewonki Foundation
Wiscasset, Maine

PRESENT: Dud Hendrick, Seth Bernier, Bob Healy, Jack Bussell, Kristina Wolff, Tom Whitney, Tom Sturtevant, Richard Clement, Rita Clement, Dan Avener, Clarence Smith, Michael Uhl, Dan Ellis, Doug Rawlings, Bruce Gagnon, Mary Beth Sullivan, Victor Skarapa, Bob Dale, Bob Lezer, Peggy Akers, Suzanne Hedricks, Tim Blanchette, Rob Pfeiffer, Stan Lofchie, and Lukie Lofchie

At 8:30am, Dud began the day with a brief welcome and an invitation for us to share an anecdote or two about our military service or our peace activism. We were done at 10:15am. The remarks were both somber and humorous, “.important to the teller and to the listener” (Dud). Dud closed this part of the session by thanking all of us for being a part of VFP.

At 10:25am, Bruce facilitated a discussion about the changing political landscape under the Obama administration. He began by outlining his concerns about the new National Security Advisor, General James Jones. If we’re concerned about an expanding military empire, he’s the “guy to watch.” He’s closely aligned with Robert Gates and is very interested in the US establishing a stronger foothold in Africa. Suzanne suggested that Obama need not always be willing to compromise with the militarists, that he should listen to groups like VFP. Smitty pointed out that Obama’s team is IT savvy and therefore susceptible to messages from us. Michael advised us to look out for the first national security statement from the Obama administration. It will provide us with a roadmap into this administration’s worldview. Stan brought us back to General Jones – he aspires to be the next Kissinger – and reminded us that Obama is no “leftie.” Seth compared Obama’s Charisma to that of JFK’s – people mistook his youthfulness for liberalism, too but he led us into Vietnam. Seth advised us to “connect the dots” and reach out as a group to other groups who are equally skeptical. Bob Lezer reminded us that we should be a group for peace. Dud thought that Obama will be more inclusive than Bush, but we still can’t accept the war in Afghanistan; Dud hoped that the air wasn’t out of the peace movement and reminded us that we as VFP must keep the pressure on Snowe and Collins to get out of Afghanistan and Iraq. Victor mentioned that the corporations control our government and that the only way to break free of that control is to hold instant run-off elections. Rob Pfeiffer stated that right now there are 35,000 veterans in this country who have been severely injured in Iraq and there are untold thousands who are suffering from PTSD.

Jack thanked the Chapter 003 members for getting the word out about removing the National Guard from Iraq and Afghanistan. Tom Sturtevant mentioned that he has been trying to get legislators in Maine to support a bill withdrawing all National Guard troops from Iraq. Tom Whitney reminded us that we need to look for root causes and then act from that knowledge. We should connect the dots, as Seth says, and work with groups around certain issues. For Tom, a major issue is health care and the need for a single-payer system. Dan Avener thinks that campaign finance reform is at the heart of many of our political woes – we need to be realistic and stay focused on politicians and their connections to he corporations. Bob Healy quoted Phillip Berrigan (“War is a failure of the imagination”) and reminded us that we’re all dependent on this country and how its government distributes our resources; we need to re-think that mode of distribution so that we can all have a life that is peaceful. Suzanne thinks that the time is perfect for women in the US to voice their concerns and to support Michelle Obama as she begins her work in the White House.

Dud reminded us of the upcoming No Bases Campaign conference in Washington at the end of February and beginning of March. Dud, Michael, and Bruce will be involved. Michael thinks that Obama’s centrist stand will give us some openings to begin a dialogue. He reassured us that the national board of VFP is working on elevating the public image of VFP as a credible player. Tim urges us to look at war from an ethical standpoint, to approach war as a moral issue as we make contact with the Obama administration. Stan suggested that we remain skeptical of the Obama administration: Obama has not contested the CIA torture stance; concerning Palestine, he sends Mitchell with the same rhetoric as the Bush administration uses; we must remain vigilant since there is no record that Obama is for peace and there’s plenty that he’s bought into the military/industrial/congressional model of war and aggression.

Bruce reminded us of the upcoming Town Hall Meeting, which is gaining support. There’s good press coverage; they still need money to help cover the costs of the hall; it’s a great opportunity for various groups to dialogue even if the politicians don’t appear. Seth agreed with Bob Lezer – VFP should advocate for peace and work on bringing others along with us.

This session ended at 11:05am. Dud moved us on to the next agenda item. We broke into small groups of four or five to discuss the following topics:

*Fundraising — Michael framed the topic for us. How do we raise money outside of our existing sources?

*Chapter Initiatives — Probably the most eloquent speaker of the day rose to address the membership and frame this question. He-who-need-not-be-named expressed an interest in following three strands as we develop our strategies and policies for the coming year: education of the public about war and its consequences; political action to emphasize our stances on particular issues to the general public; and community service focusing on the victims of war (including but not limited to veterans and their families).

*Website, brochure, and list-serve — Dan Ellis reminded us that our publications (in print and on line) are our first line of communication with the public and our fellow veterans. So our first item of business here is to update the brochure. Secondly, we need to become more actively involved in the website. Dan is getting little feedback (in particular with the on-line monthly calendar). He does receive stats from our server company on the number of hits per day. He would like us to consider a system that allows others to participate in providing content to the web. Doug also mentioned that the list-serve is still being “monitored” by him as chapter secretary. Although he has received a few complaints about access to the list-serve, it seems to be going okay. Is that true?

*2010 Convention — Jack gave us some samples of how the t-shirts might look. He also requested that groups come up with some recommended speakers and entertainers. He also asked us to consider a theme for the convention. Reminder: the convention is the 25th anniversary of VFP, will take place August 18th to the 22nd at the Eastland Hotel in Portland. There is a role for all chapter members, so get ready.

After the small groups met and after lunch, we gathered as the group as a whole and reported out our suggestions and comments. Here they are without any editing (remember that this is a brainstorming session):


  1. concert before symposium and a Friday night reading of Penny Coleman’s play on PTSD
  2. house parties based on themes (veterans helping veterans?)
  3. selling VFP material (clotheslines? Garden markers? Grave markers? Calendars? )
  4. bike races
  5. war toys replacements
  6. book covers
  7. foot races
  8. new gear for the chapter (t-shirts, boxers, socks)
  9. kayak raffle
  10. board members and then other members asked to contribute donations
  11. some thought that treasury is sufficiently funded and that other fundraising activities are unnecessary at this point
  12. have something like Chapter 003’s sailing raffle
  13. have a party or two with a famous person and charge for attendance – Skoglund? Shetterly? Williams? King?
  14. pursue a ZOCS grant from VFP ($500) and a grant from the Maine Humanities Council ($500) to help cover expenses for the PTSD Symposium this year



  1. the current one is too busy and dark; we need to weed out what we’re not doing
  2. healing should be a focus
  3. it should be inviting to possible new members
  4. symposia should be mentioned
  5. treatment groups should be mentioned
  6. how can we focus on outreach to returning veterans?
  7. we should ask for advice from other chapters (Peggy volunteered to research other chapters’ brochures)
  8. there should be pictures of us doing something
  9. basic editing and word changes are needed; we have to be conscious of parallel structure
  10. at the February meeting we should designate a committee to work on the new brochure
  11. it should be two-color on a color stock
  12. web address should be more prominently featured with a request to “contact us”


  1. the list-serve should be clear on how to make replies and comments (Doug should set up a separate e-mail address to handle that)
  2. the web site rocks!
  3. the list-serve should be kept as it is, dealing mostly with social issues that are related to the military
  4. we need to develop criteria for our web-site: it should list our chapter’s activities; the calendar should list our activities and the activities of other state-wide groups aligned with us (what gets on the calendar should be left to the discretion of the web wizard [Dan Ellis]
  5. another member of our chapter should be “assigned” to work with Dan (especially with soliciting and maintaining calendar items)
  6. there should be links to other peace groups on the site, with a reciprocal agreement with these other groups (i.e., they link us to their sites as well)
  7. the web wizard should be paid an annual retainer for his work (a February meeting item)
  8. the list-serve should have a feed back mechanism to encourage discussion (Secretary’s note: well, okay, but somebody else will have to do that since it’s very labor intensive)
  9. how can we get more exposure of what we’re doing using the web site and list-serve?


  1. hold a teach-in with other peace groups: Afghanistan might be the first topic; racism another; sexism another
  2. PTSD Symposia continued
  3. we should focus on resource wars as a lead-in to the 2010 convention (i.e., make it a point to become better educated on the subject and organize various discussions/films/speakers throughout the 2009/2010 years as we head into the convention)
  4. No-Base movement focus (try to have as many chapter members as possible attend the No-Bases Convention in Washington at the end of February)
  5. economic conversion focus
  6. global network collaboration
  7. we need to get critical statements and position statements out more quickly (example: the Israeli attack on the Gaza should have received a timely response from our chapter that could be put out to the press). We need to have a vehicle in place to get out statements within 24 hours of a major event involving the military and our government’s support of other military actions. Suggestion that at the February meeting we put together a steering committee that will be responsible for this.


  1. Possible theme: “Healing the Wounds of War” (includes veterans’ issues, environmental issues, family issues, psychological issues, racism, and sexism)
  2. Possible speakers: Gary Zukof and Linda Francis, Nick Turse and Joe Gerson
  3. Israeli Refuseniks as possible speakers/panel
  4. Seeds of Peace Camp connection
  5. Speakers: Jodi Williams, Howard Zinn, Ann Wright, Noam Chomsky, Kathy Kelly, Michael Klare, Michael Kosstovsky, Helen Caldicoff, John Sims, Ehren Watada, Andrew Bacevich, Cynthia McKenney, various members of IVAW
  6. Possible theme: “Resource Wars” (food, water, minerals, land, people, etc)
  7. move the traditional action that is held at the end of the convention to the middle of the convention
  8. Possible workshops: skill building (lobbying, building healthy chapters, developing effective websites, etc); the economic draft; space technology
  9. T-Shirts: what should be the theme on the shirt?
  10. Possible theme: “Conversion”
  11. Question: what is the role of the national in choosing the theme? Do we choose a theme and they approve it?
  12. Possible theme: “No Good War/No War for Resources”
  13. Possible theme: “Healing the Victims”
  14. we could use our next two PTSD symposia as precursors to the convention, focusing on the concept of healing and health alternatives
  15. Possible theme: “25 Years of Working Toward Peace”
  16. The final decision of the theme should be made by the entire chapter; members should be given three or four themes to choose from and then vote

After we exhausted all of the topics, Dud moved us back into the traditional business model.


Tim submitted the January 2009 report. Our current balance is $6821.84 (January 22, 2009). We began month of December with a balance of $5182.75. During the next two months we expended $3775.45 (postage and supplies of $33.60; donation given to Sunny Corner Fuel Assistance of $200; Chewonki Retreat deposit of $200; a $2500 transfer of funds into the 2010 convention account; $64.20 for Maine Sales tax. $727.65 in MaineShare dues; and $50 paid out in petty cash). We also took in $5414.54 during the same time period (MaineShare gave us $4624.54; membership dues amounted to $360; donations amounted to $430).

The Legal Defense Fund is holding at $1730 (no activity) and the 2010 Convention account is now at $4500.

The question was raised if we need to keep a 2010 convention fund since our understanding is that the national will cover all convention expenses. Michael said that he’d check into this. Some of us felt that it’s still a good idea just in case and we can use the money for initial expenses to be reimbursed later by the national. We concluded to leave the account as is unless an emergency need develops.


Rob is requesting $1,000 from the chapter as seed money to get his personal counseling service for veterans with PTSD off the ground ($350 for printing of brochures; $150 for mailing and phoning costs; $500 for scholarships for needy veterans). He presented two prototypes for advertising his services: a brochure and a broadsheet. Right now he has lined up 26 volunteer practitioners who have had some success working with alternative health practices when dealing with PTSD clients. He would charge clients anywhere from $5.00 to $15.00 per visit.

Comments: Michael would support the $1,000 contribution if Rob agrees to provide a workshop at this year’s symposium at no charge to the chapter Stan and Tom Whitney were concerned about the scientific validity of these alternative practices. Set offered some legal advice: in his opinion the way Rob has set up the proposal, our chapter would not be subjected to any legal obligations and future difficulties. Rob assured us that all practitioners would be covered under their own malpractice insurance. Kristina suggested that we go ahead but ask Rob not to use our VFP name. Tom Whitney wanted to know if Rob would be acting as a coordinator or a facilitator. He also expressed concern about the program’s dependence on volunteer services. After awhile, Tom pointed out, volunteers stop volunteering. He suggests that a firmer, paid commitment should be sought.

Peggy remarked that she’s be proud to be associated with Rob’s program and that we should keep our VFP name closely associated with the venture. Rita concurred – she pointed put that this is a direct service to veterans and isn’t that what we’re all about? Doug suggested that if funded by us that Rob should be responsible for submitting quarterly reports on the project’s progress.

Motion: Kristina moved (and Smitty seconded) that our chapter provide Rob Pfeiffer with $1,000 in seed money to support his “Veterans Helping Veterans” project contingent upon three requirements: that all material used to promote the project include our chapter’s contact information (mailing address and website address); that Rob submit quarterly reports to our chapter president for discussion at chapter business meetings; and that Rob commit to presenting his work at our annual PTSD symposia in workshop format. Discussion: hitney remarked that Rob’s quarterly reports not be too detailed. Seth’s legal opinion is that if all participants are insured, we as a chapter should have no problem. A vote was called: 24 in favor and one not in favor. The motion passes and Tim Blanchette will cut Rob a check for $1,000.


Dud thinks that our chapter should help Tom Sturtevant (a Korean War veteran) to attend the conference. Bob Lezer moved (Stan second) that the chapter should provide Tom with $300 to help defray his costs. No discussion. Motion passed unanimously.



Dud suggested that we pay Michael Uhl’s registration fee for attending the PTSD conference in Portland on the 8th. He would act as an “emissary” of sorts, promoting our June symposium and also gathering information/names for help in designing our own symposia. Stan moved to provide $200 in chapter funds to support Michael. Bruce seconded. No discussion. Motion passed unanimously.


Peggy moved that we provide $50 in support of the upcoming town hall meeting in Portland. Bob Lezer’s friendly amendment upped that to $100. Peggy moved that $100 be provided to Bruce Gagnon to support the Town Hall meeting. Kristina seconded the motion. No discussion. Motion passed unanimously.

The meeting adjourned, and the retreat ended, at 3:45pm.